 |
|
 |
|
|
Lamberts
Yard 29th October 2003 L. Fiddler Esq.,
Dear Mr. Fiddler, re: DCA Consultation Paper “Delivering value for money in the Criminal Defence Service” I hope that I am not exhibiting impatience by sending you a copy of my letter of the 15th October but I bear in mind that my first letter to the Department seemed to go astray notwithstanding I had an acknowledgement postcard. I am confident that you will in fact agree that my correspondence has shown patience and understanding on my part. More recently I have been asked by a number of people to continue the correspondence not only for myself but on their behalf as well. In order that they may be kept up-to-date with our correspondence I propose adding the letters to my web site. I decided to check with you initially to see if there would be any objection whatsoever to this. If this is a problem could you please get back to me, by return, to explain the problem in order that I can act appropriately. One problem that comes with “class” correspondence is that there seems to be a collective impatience to progress. In those circumstances I am hopeful that you will not mind if I ask that replies are sent as quickly as possible. Others may not be as patient as I am and I don’t want the correspondence to slow down because of any weight of similar letters being sent to your office. Having said that I am, of course, extremely grateful to you for the time, effort and expertise put into the responses and I would not want to encourage any action that has the effect of putting any of those attributes at risk. I look forward to hearing from you at your early convenience. Yours sincerely,
Dennis A. Clarke |
 |
 |
Copyright 2004 ~ Clarke Kiernan Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority - No.262841 |